Cupertino Real Estate Market Trends and Statistics
How’s the Cupertino real estate market?
Cupertino has been in a buying frenzy for about the last year. Prices are up considerably both year over year and month over month. Home values are now noticeably higher than the previous peak of the market (2007). So the good news for Cupertino area homeowners is this: all of you should have equity!
Now see the numbers for houses in Cupertino that are for sale or sold in the last month for which we have data on my Real Estate Report for Cupertino:
| Trends At a Glance | Feb 2013 | Previous Month | Year-over Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Price | $1,392,880 | $1,180,000 (+18.0%) | $975,000 (+42.9%) |
| Average Price | $1,428,410 | $1,244,800 (+14.8%) | $1,119,850 (+27.6%) |
| No. of Sales | 16 | 15 (+6.7%) | 17 (-5.9%) |
| Pending Properties | 19 | 14 (+35.7%) | 29 (-34.5%) |
| Foreclosures Sold | 0 | 0 (N/A) | 0 (N/A) |
| Short Sales Sold | 0 | 0 (N/A) | 0 (N/A) |
| Active Listings | 18 | 14 (+28.6%) | 36 (-50.0%) |
| Active Foreclosures | 0 | 0 (N/A) | 1 (-100.0%) |
| Active Short Sales | 0 | 0 (N/A) | 2 (-100.0%) |
| Sales Price vs. List Price | 106.3% | 105.5% (+0.8%) | 99.5% (+6.9%) |
| Days on Market | 18 | 28 (-36.1%) | 42 (-57.7%) |
The sale price to list price ratio in Cupertino is stratospheric at 106.3%. I looked on the MLS (using the stats feature) back to Jan 2004 and only once was this figure bettered, and that was in February 2005 – just prior to the peak. This is a clue that people should heed about how overheated the market is. Figures for this area are even more striking if we consider less expensive areas with Cupertino schools, such as parts of San Jose and Sunnyvale. Allow me to show you in the charts below:
First, houses in the City of Cupertino – average days on market, average sales price to list price ratio (over 106%).
Next, “area 18″ – the Cupertino area, which includes parts of San Jose (so less expensive), same type of data:
Please notice that with this second chart, the sale price to list price ratio is not 106%, but 108.8%!!!! At NO time in since Jan 2004 was there a sale price to list price ratio this high. Closest in the pre 2013 years was Feb 2005, the previous extreme high of 108% (even) – and this one’s got it beat by almost one more point. It’s long, but I’m going to copy and paste this datafrom MLSListings so that you can see how out of place this ratio is – and again, that I consider it a warning sign that we are in dangerous territory. I will make bold every month with a SP to LP ratio of 105% or more:
| Month | Sale Price to List Price Ratio | Average Days to Sell |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2004 | 100.2% | 35 |
| Feb 2004 | 101.8% | 34 |
| Mar 2004 | 102.3% | 22 |
| Apr 2004 | 102.4% | 17 |
| May 2004 | 102.1% | 23 |
| Jun 2004 | 101.7% | 29 |
| Jul 2004 | 101.7% | 27 |
| Aug 2004 | 101.0% | 27 |
| Sep 2004 | 101.6% | 35 |
| Oct 2004 | 101.0% | 27 |
| Nov 2004 | 102.5% | 26 |
| Dec 2004 | 102.8% | 26 |
| Jan 2005 | 105.5% | 15 |
| Feb 2005 | 108.0% | 26 |
| Mar 2005 | 106.8% | 16 |
| Apr 2005 | 106.2% | 14 |
| May 2005 | 105.4% | 18 |
| Jun 2005 | 104.3% | 29 |
| Jul 2005 | 101.2% | 28 |
| Aug 2005 | 101.8% | 26 |
| Sep 2005 | 100.1% | 40 |
| Oct 2005 | 99.5% | 25 |
| Nov 2005 | 100.9% | 25 |
| Dec 2005 | 100.2% | 40 |
| Jan 2006 | 99.8% | 42 |
| Feb 2006 | 100.3% | 37 |
| Mar 2006 | 101.8% | 27 |
| Apr 2006 | 102.4% | 20 |
| May 2006 | 102.3% | 19 |
| Jun 2006 | 102.6% | 21 |
| Jul 2006 | 101.8% | 30 |
| Aug 2006 | 100.9% | 39 |
| Sep 2006 | 99.8% | 35 |
| Oct 2006 | 100.4% | 41 |
| Nov 2006 | 98.9% | 63 |
| Dec 2006 | 98.1% | 75 |
| Jan 2007 | 99.2% | 45 |
| Feb 2007 | 100.4% | 38 |
| Mar 2007 | 102.0% | 24 |
| Apr 2007 | 104.7% | 18 |
| May 2007 | 106.2% | 18 |
| Jun 2007 | 103.0% | 22 |
| Jul 2007 | 104.2% | 26 |
| Aug 2007 | 102.3% | 26 |
| Sep 2007 | 102.6% | 26 |
| Oct 2007 | 102.3% | 58 |
| Nov 2007 | 100.8% | 41 |
| Dec 2007 | 101.5% | 48 |
| Jan 2008 | 101.7% | 35 |
| Feb 2008 | 101.9% | 21 |
| Mar 2008 | 101.7% | 39 |
| Apr 2008 | 104.2% | 29 |
| May 2008 | 99.6% | 31 |
| Jun 2008 | 101.0% | 24 |
| Jul 2008 | 100.2% | 30 |
| Aug 2008 | 99.0% | 65 |
| Sep 2008 | 99.0% | 49 |
| Oct 2008 | 99.1% | 44 |
| Nov 2008 | 95.4% | 81 |
| Dec 2008 | 97.1% | 55 |
| Jan 2009 | 96.0% | 54 |
| Feb 2009 | 94.8% | 74 |
| Mar 2009 | 97.3% | 76 |
| Apr 2009 | 96.2% | 57 |
| May 2009 | 96.3% | 54 |
| Jun 2009 | 97.0% | 41 |
| Jul 2009 | 96.5% | 59 |
| Aug 2009 | 98.6% | 67 |
| Sep 2009 | 98.1% | 56 |
| Oct 2009 | 99.7% | 49 |
| Nov 2009 | 99.3% | 74 |
| Dec 2009 | 100.1% | 58 |
| Jan 2010 | 100.3% | 62 |
| Feb 2010 | 100.1% | 39 |
| Mar 2010 | 100.7% | 33 |
| Apr 2010 | 101.5% | 27 |
| May 2010 | 101.8% | 31 |
| Jun 2010 | 101.7% | 20 |
| Jul 2010 | 99.8% | 24 |
| Aug 2010 | 100.5% | 35 |
| Sep 2010 | 99.1% | 52 |
| Oct 2010 | 98.3% | 34 |
| Nov 2010 | 99.3% | 66 |
| Dec 2010 | 98.5% | 78 |
| Jan 2011 | 98.4% | 50 |
| Feb 2011 | 100.2% | 24 |
| Mar 2011 | 99.9% | 34 |
| Apr 2011 | 101.4% | 20 |
| May 2011 | 101.6% | 30 |
| Jun 2011 | 101.2% | 23 |
| Jul 2011 | 100.6% | 36 |
| Aug 2011 | 100.5% | 46 |
| Sep 2011 | 100.9% | 36 |
| Oct 2011 | 99.8% | 43 |
| Nov 2011 | 99.3% | 54 |
| Dec 2011 | 97.1% | 48 |
| Jan 2012 | 97.3% | 47 |
| Feb 2012 | 99.8% | 63 |
| Mar 2012 | 104.5% | 23 |
| Apr 2012 | 102.5% | 26 |
| May 2012 | 104.4% | 15 |
| Jun 2012 | 105.5% | 19 |
| Jul 2012 | 103.0% | 19 |
| Aug 2012 | 103.8% | 22 |
| Sep 2012 | 103.9% | 26 |
| Oct 2012 | 105.1% | 26 |
| Nov 2012 | 104.4% | 26 |
| Dec 2012 | 104.8% | 29 |
| Jan 2013 | 106.9% | 14 |
| Feb 2013 | 108.8% | 22 |
| Mar 2013 | 107.2% (so far) | 20 |
We are seeing some parts of Santa Clara County pull back slightly, but in the Cupertino area it seems to be striving for more insanity and recklessness. (Bubble? I think so.) This last week I was working with some home buyers for a Sunnyvale house that has Cupertino schools. That home had over 120 disclosure packages pulled and I suspect that when it closes, it will be more than 20% over the list price. With these crazy multiple offers, buyers are competing against all cash and non-contingent offers (sometimes the offers are both). We cannot recommend buying properties without even a loan contingency – it is too risky – but that is exactly what many are doing.
Let’s look at sale prices over time. This next chart is for houses (and duet homes) in the Cupertino area, or “Area 18″ as defined by our MLS. The peaks of the market are in green and the trough in blue. Please study the patterns: usually we see a little up and down, but the up overtaking in the long run. Just before the last peak, though, which was in late 2007 for this area, there was a runup in pricing without much of the corrective pull backs we usually see. That’s the pattern we have right now, also, which I think is another reason to be extremely cautious right now.
What else can we learn about the Cupertino real estate market today? Something very important is what is actually selling. Next, please find what has sold & closed escrow year to date (2013 so far) in Cupertino, California, by price point. Here you find where most home values lie, at least those sold. I spot checked 2012 sales and the highest pricing band was the 1.2 – 1.4. Want to buy in Cupertino? Most homes are between $1 million and $1.6 million. Want to sell in Cupertino? It’s possible over $2 million, but a much bigger challenge.
In the end, it always comes down to what a buyer will pay and what a seller will accept. And how do sellers view it? They want the most money, best terms (free rentbacks) and least risk. Cash lowers risk considerably so if everything else is equal, cash will win. Contingencies increase risk, so each contingency in place causes the offer to be viewed less favorably (and the longer they are, the worse). So many are writing non-contingent offers. To me, this is reckless. Something outside of your or my control, such as a large earthquake, a terrorist attack or a stock market crash could change everything – and if you couldn’t close on the deal, your initial deposit could be lost. In my professional opinion, this is highly dangerous so I cannot recommend it, no matter how “popular” it becomes in practice.
And here’s a quick look at the Cupertino condominiums and townhouses for sale or recently sold:
| Trends At a Glance | Feb 2013 | Previous Month | Year-over Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Price | $681,000 | $620,000 (+9.8%) | $560,000 (+21.6%) |
| Average Price | $695,500 | $589,000 (+18.1%) | $534,286 (+30.2%) |
| No. of Sales | 4 | 5 (-20.0%) | 7 (-42.9%) |
| Pending Properties | 12 | 5 (+140.0%) | 6 (+100.0%) |
| Foreclosures Sold | 0 | 1 (-100.0%) | 0 (N/A) |
| Short Sales Sold | 0 | 0 (N/A) | 0 (N/A) |
| Active Listings | 5 | 4 (+25.0%) | 11 (-54.5%) |
| Active Foreclosures | 0 | 0 (N/A) | 1 (-100.0%) |
| Active Short Sales | 0 | 0 (N/A) | 2 (-100.0%) |
| Sales Price vs. List Price | 109.4% | 103.4% (+5.8%) | 97.3% (+12.5%) |
| Days on Market | 21 | 26 (-17.7%) | 38 (-44.7%) |
It’s still a seller’s market – and in fact the sales price to list price ratio is even worse…. So the same general trends for houses apply just as much to townhouses and condos.
Cupertino Median List Prices of houses Compared to Neighboring Saratoga, Sunnyvale and Los Altos
We know that the median sales price in Cupertino has been climbing steadily since March 1st (reflecting sales beginning in early February). How does it compare to nearby areas?
Los Altos is selling for the most of these 4 areas, but list prices fell for awhile when other areas were rising – but it now has another uptick since November. Saratoga was dippping but now rising again. Sunnyvale has been somewhat flat recently but improving. But Cupertino’s prices are making the steepest improvement. Perhaps these low prices are the drivers for the crazy hot market activity.
Cupertino median list price of houses by price quartile
Focusing just on Cupertino, let’s see how the information looks if we break it down into the pricing tier. Often the entry level houses are a very different “market” than the luxury homes segment.
The last few months have had some ups and downs in pricing, but most segments of the Cupertino real estate market have seen an uptick since the fall. The luxury market in Cupertino has rising for most of the year, too.
What if we look back more than a year? Combining the quartiles, the trends look pretty volatile:
What’s happening with the most expensive homes for sale in Cupertino? They have had a rough time of it – but currently there’s an uptick in the market at this price point. Here’s the same data just for the top quartile, the most expensive properties (luxury homes segment):
For the 2nd top tier (upper middle):
3rd level or lower middle:
And most affordable Cupertino houses or lowest quartile:
Cupertino Days on Market by Price Quartile: What’s Selling Fastest
Not surprisingly, the luxury market has had a harder time selling than entry level houses in Cupertino. This is true for most of the West Valley areas of Santa Clara County. Here’s a look at the days on market (DOM) for Cupertino by price point over the last year.
Remember, all real estate is local. For information on your exact area or price point, please contact me. I work with my clients to pinpoint the pricing.
What drives the Cupertino real estate market?
The residential real estate market in Cupertino, California, is driven in large part by the extremely high quality of its local public schools. Many in Silicon Valley would state that for San Jose area home buyers, Cupertino offers the best “bang for the buck” when one lines up the cost of purchasing a home to the schools’ API scores. (Conversely, some residents are concerned that the very top schools – including but not limited to Cupertino – are so focused on academics that there may be too much pressure on kids and may lack balance for them.)
Other drivers are, of course, the local economy (such as the initial public offerings happening with some of the Silicon Valley tech giants), the availability of more affordable financing, and how the realty market in general is performing for any particular price point or particular school area. (Even within Cupertino, some schools are much more in demand than others.) Comments in this article refer generally to this city of about 50,000 residents – real estate is local, though, so for precise information in any given area or tier of the market, please contact me!
Houses for sale in Cupertino California
Please browse houses for sale in Cupertino, listed from the lowest prices up to the highest.
Showing properties
1 - 5 of 19.
See more Real estate in the city of Cupertino.
(all data current as of
5/25/2013)
-
$799,000 : 16790 Stevens Canyon Rd, Cupertino3 beds, 2 full baths
-
$1,080,000 : 20337 Via San Marino, Cupertino5 beds, 3 full baths
-
$1,098,000 : 882 Brookgrove Ln, Cupertino4 beds, 2 full baths
-
$1,188,000 : 19250 Tilson Av, Cupertino4 beds, 2 full baths
-
$1,199,000 : 20087 Somerset Dr, Cupertino3 beds, 2 full baths
Listing information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Read full disclaimer.
Tags: bubble, Cupertino, home prices, median list price, median sales price, overheated, price, Real estate, real estate market, silicon valley, Silicon Valley real estate, statistics, trends









January 24th, 2013 at 5:07 am
Once again…..hitting it out of the park!!!
January 27th, 2013 at 1:21 pm
Thank you, Anne!
March 22nd, 2013 at 1:27 pm
Great article, Mary. The SP/LP numbers are bonkers, and it’s low inventory, everyone waiting for everyone else to list first. After all, wait and you’ll get more, right?
One very minor caveat. “Just before the peak in 2005″ does not and never did apply to the Real Bay Area. The crap areas peaked in 2005/6. Better areas (definitely includes almost all of CUSD) did not peak until Summer or even Fall of 2008. Even the rough three tiers of Case Shiller show that (and yes, C-S does not cover Santa Clara County, but the patterns are strikingly similar).
March 22nd, 2013 at 2:35 pm
Thanks for the thorough comment. Actually I didn’t mean to say that the peak was in 2005 – I thought it was in late 2007, early 2008. My bad on not saying that very well – won’t redact it now but that was a goof on my part. Elsewhere in the post, I pointed to late 2007: “Just before the last peak, though, which was in late 2007 for this area, there was a runup in pricing without much of the corrective pull backs we usually see.” (In other areas of SCC it seems that it was early 2008 for the peak.)
I have a subscription to the REReport for Cupertino and I went back into the history there. Looks like the peak median and average sales prices for Cupertino were in August 2007. So I don’t think Case Shiller is accurate there. Have a peek at the graphs or charts and see what you think, esp the one “Prices and Sales”.
Thanks again for the insightful comments.