The Arbitration Clause in the Real Estate Contract: To Sign or Not To Sign?
Saturday, September 4th, 2010
Should you sign the arbitration clause in your real estate listing or sales contract? I can’t tell you. Seriously. As a real estate licensee in California, I am not supposed to guide people to initial or not initial for it because that would be giving legal advice. (Realtors and other real estate sales people are admonished not to provide, and are not qualified to give, either tax or legal advice.)
Arbitration is a choice that consumers have both when listing a home (between you and the brokerage/agent) and when selling a home (between you and the seller or buyer). In reality, nearly all people do initial for arbitration, though, so many people do not feel that they really do have a choice. When you sell or buy your home here in Silicon Valley, there’s a very high probablilty (perhaps a certainty) that the other principals in the transaction will opt for arbitration – at least if it’s a “regular sale”.
With arbitration, if there were a big problem (not “small claims court” material), the issue would first go to non-binding mediation. That is, you’d all have to sit around the table (so to speak) and talk it through and try to find a resolution on your own. If mediation fails, then it would go before an arbitrator whom both sides would agree on. Usually they are retired superior court judges or someone with a lot of real estate law experience. He or she would hear the case and decide. You only get one shot at it with arbitration, there’s no appeal if you’re unhappy with the decision.
With litigation you’re still supposed to do mediation first, but then if you go to trial and don’t like the decision rendered, you MAY be able to appeal it to a higher court if the system thinks you have a reasonable gripe about the decision. No guarantees, but the possibility exists.
The plus to arbitration is that it’s faster and cheaper. The plus to litigation is the right to continue to protest (appeal).
(more…)




